Update on China’s Property Situation

Real Estate
Recent regulatory measures on China’s property sector exposed a variety of property developers as vulnerable. Several meaningful players have defaulted and/or remain in distress. Lending to the sector is curtailed and therefore liquid assets and liquidation of assets have proven important. 

Ongoing distress and defaults 

A turning point for the sector has not yet been reached; however, regulators and the central government have recently implemented targeted measures to limit collateral damage on companies that are well run and regulatorily well behaved. For those companies that failed to comply with existing regulations or have been exposed with undisclosed liabilities—we do not expect the government to provide salvation. Distress and strain in the sector is expected to endure for several quarters at least.


Government response 

We believe the Chinese government has extensive resources to ensure defaults and acute pain in the property sector is reasonably contained. The government desires financial stability and the current, planned, “blood-letting” was to forestall a true nationally systemic crisis when problems in the property sector exceeded the government’s resources. Importantly, the government desires a proper reallocation of resources away from property development to more productive resources—any regulatory/stimulatory response is likely to bear this strategy in mind. Therefore, the sector is likely to shrink along with supporting industries and trading partners.


Given a policy priority to assure properties are finished and delivered, local governments have suddenly increased the amount of cash required to be held at project escrow accounts, which most developers report as unrestricted cash. Moreover, commercial banks have also increased the cash collateral required for its construction loans. These measures have exacerbated the liquidity squeeze faced by property developers and reduced the transparency of their cash position. The balance sheet transparency has also recently deteriorated after some developers swiftly reduced their reported debt to comply with the government’s debt leverage guidelines or “three red lines” that were released in early 2020. The most common practices to reduce their reported debt have been disguising it as payables, moving it to unconsolidated joint ventures, and issuing unconsolidated private bonds that contain a company guarantee. 


Contagion risk? 

Although the early moments of property market stress in 2020 weighed on emerging markets sentiment and caused bouts of volatility, we continue to discount this as a source for major negative contagion risk to global markets (please refer to an earlier discussion). Closed economies with capital controls and a managed currency tend to absorb economic volatility domestically—without “leakage” to the global financial system—until the central bank expires its resources. 


In China’s case, record balance or payments surpluses in 2021 have enhanced the Chinese central bank’s ability to absorb any transitory duress from the property sector that may have otherwise caused otherwise self-reinforcing currency and interest rate volatility. The possibility remains that contagion will spread to some highly indebted local governments and its state-owned enterprises, especially those that are highly reliant on land sales to fund their budgets. While the central government might tolerate some distress for these bond issuers, some of which have offshore bonds, it will ultimately provide financial support if risk aversion threatens the broad financial stability. 


Growth implications 

We expect to see China’s GDP growth to decelerate this year and to continue to slow for the foreseeable future. The desired rebalancing of the economy is the driving force of this expected decline, the current property sector duress has simply hastened and accelerated the slope of the decline because that was the traditional vector of large-scale economy-wide stimulus—policy makers will want to avoid stimulating via the property sector as this would enhance/enlarge property’s role in the overall economy when the strategy is to shrink it relative to other sectors (consumer primarily). 


Ripple effects?

China’s economy is one of the largest and most important for many trading partners. China should slow and the pivot from property-led fixed asset investment will affect countries such as Chile and Australia who extensively supply to this sector. Chile and Australia are not alone, and we expect several primary trading partners to see concomitant structural growth declines of between 20-50 basis points per annum. 


Opportunities amid the rubble?

Prior to 2021, we largely avoided the Chinese property market given lack of compelling value amidst a now validated view of structural decline. Bond prices have declined materially since the current acute episode began last fall. However, we continue to struggle to find a plethora for compelling investment ideas—for want of balance sheet transparency. These situations often present attractive absolute return opportunities for nimble managers however, we believe discipline and patience is key. In the current environment, we are looking for compelling opportunity and being very selective. 

Important disclosures



This material is provided by Aegon Asset Management (Aegon AM) as general information and is intended exclusively for institutional and wholesale investors, as well as professional clients (as defined by local laws and regulation) and other Aegon AM stakeholders. 


This document is for informational purposes only in connection with the marketing and advertising of products and services, and is not investment research, advice or a recommendation. It shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation to buy any investment nor shall any offer of products or services be made to any person in any jurisdiction where unlawful or unauthorized. Any opinions, estimates, or forecasts expressed are the current views of the author(s) at the time of publication and are subject to change without notice. The research taken into account in this document may or may not have been used for or be consistent with all Aegon AM investment strategies. References to securities, asset classes and financial markets are included for illustrative purposes only and should not be relied upon to assist or inform the making of any investment decisions. It has not been prepared in accordance with any legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, and may have been acted upon by Aegon AM and Aegon AM staff for their own purposes. 


The information contained in this material does not take into account any investor’s investment objectives, particular needs, or financial situation. It should not be considered a comprehensive statement on any matter and should not be relied upon as such. Nothing in this material constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a representation that any investment or strategy is suitable or appropriate to any particular investor. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole discretion of the recipient. Investors should consult their investment professional prior to making an investment decision. Aegon AM is under no obligation, expressed or implied, to update the information contained herein. Neither Aegon AM nor any of its affiliated entities are undertaking to provide impartial investment advice or give advice in a fiduciary capacity for purposes of any applicable US federal or state law or regulation. By receiving this communication, you agree with the intended purpose described above. 


Past performance is not a guide to future performance. All investments contain risk and may lose value. This document contains “forward-looking statements” which are based on Aegon AM’s beliefs, as well as on a number of assumptions concerning future events, based on information currently available. These statements involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions which are difficult to predict. Consequently, such statements cannot be guarantees of future performance, and actual outcomes and returns may differ materially from statements set forth herein.  


The following Aegon affiliates are collectively referred to herein as Aegon Asset Management: Aegon USA Investment Management, LLC (Aegon AM US), Aegon USA Realty Advisors, LLC (Aegon RA), Aegon Asset Management UK plc (Aegon AM UK), and Aegon Investment Management B.V. (Aegon AM NL). Each of these Aegon Asset Management entities is a wholly owned subsidiary of Aegon N.V. In addition, the following wholly or partially owned affiliates may also conduct certain business activities under the Aegon Asset Management brand: Aegon Asset Management (Asia) Limited (Aegon AM Asia). 


Aegon AM UK is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FRN: 144267) and is additionally a registered investment adviser with the United States (US) Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Aegon AM US and Aegon RA are both US SEC registered investment advisers. Aegon AM US is also registered as a Commodity Trading Advisor (CTA) with the Commodity Figures Trading Commission (CFTC) and is a member of the National Futures Association (NFA). Aegon AM NL is registered with the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets as a licensed fund management company and on the basis of its fund management license is also authorized to provide individual portfolio management and advisory services in certain jurisdictions. Aegon AM NL has also entered into a participating affiliate arrangement with Aegon AM US. Aegon AM Asia is regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong (CE No. AVR688) to carry out regulated activities in Dealing in Securities (Type 1) and Advising on Securities (Type 4). 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *